Michael Breyan v. Captain Tolth , 693 F. App'x 258 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 17-6474
    MICHAEL A. BREYAN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CAPTAIN TOLTH,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    EVERY OTHER OFFICER, involved in Disciplinary 112-N-113 on DVD Record,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
    Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00302-BHH-MGB)
    Submitted: July 20, 2017                                     Decided: July 25, 2017
    Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael Breyan, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Michael A. Breyan appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
    his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2012) action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure follow the
    court’s earlier order that he needed to bring his case into the proper form. This court may
    exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (2012), and certain
    interlocutory and collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen
    v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545–47 (1949). Because the district court
    identified deficiencies that Breyan may remedy by filing an amended complaint, we
    conclude that the order Breyan seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
    interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 
    807 F.3d 619
    , 623–24 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 
    10 F.3d 1064
    , 1066–67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of
    jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Breyan to
    amend his complaint. Goode, 807 F.3d at 630. We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED AND REMANDED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-6474

Citation Numbers: 693 F. App'x 258

Judges: Duncan, Wynn, Hamilton

Filed Date: 7/25/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024