Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Annette Riley Clarke ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 17-2095
    NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ANNETTE I. RILEY CLARKE, a/k/a Annette I. Riley,
    Defendant - Appellant,
    and
    MARLON CLARKE; CACH, LLC; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; WELLS
    FARGO, N.A.,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
    Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-01743-MBS)
    Submitted: December 21, 2017                           Decided: December 27, 2017
    Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Annette I. Riley Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Allen Calub, MCGUIREWOODS,
    LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Christina Rampey Hunoval, HUNOVAL LAW FIRM
    PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Annette Riley Clarke seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding a
    removed foreclosure action to South Carolina state court. “[A] district court may remand
    a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1447
    (c),
    and such an order is not reviewable, 
    id.
     § 1447(d).” Doe v. Blair, 
    819 F.3d 64
    , 66-67 (4th
    Cir. 2016). The district court remanded Clarke’s removed action for lack of subject
    matter jurisdiction, explaining that the complaint did not present a federal question and
    that diversity of citizenship was lacking. Because the district court remanded the action
    for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we lack jurisdiction to review its order. 
    Id.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-2095

Filed Date: 12/27/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021