Betty Hart v. Hanover County School Board , 547 F. App'x 298 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-1642
    BETTY W. HART,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; MICHAEL R. ASHBY, SR.,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (3:10-cv-00794-JRS)
    Submitted:   November 13, 2013              Decided:   December 4, 2013
    Before KING and     DAVIS,   Circuit   Judges,   and   HAMILTON,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David R. Simonsen, Jr., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.
    Yvonne Steenstra Gibney, Senior Assistant County Attorney,
    Hanover, Virginia; William Woodul Tunner, THOMPSON MCMULLAN,
    P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Betty      W.    Hart,   who    was   previously        employed      by   the
    Hanover County School Board (“the Board”), filed a complaint
    against   the       Board      and    its   Director      of   Pupil    Transportation,
    Michael Ashby, asserting that her employment was terminated in
    violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-
    219    (West    1998      &    Supp.    2013).       We   previously      affirmed        the
    district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss
    Hart’s complaint, but vacated the district court’s order denying
    Hart’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to vacate, and her Fed. R.
    Civ. P. 15(a) motion to amend her complaint.                            On remand, the
    district court denied Hart’s motion to amend her complaint, and
    denied her Rule 59(e) motion.                 Hart timely appealed.
    We    have       reviewed      the    record     and     considered        the
    parties’ arguments and find no reversible error.                           Accordingly,
    we affirm the district court’s final order.                            Hart v. Hanover
    County Sch. Bd., No. 3:10-cv-00794-JRS (E.D. Va. May 2, 2013).
    We    dispense      with       oral   argument      because    the     facts   and    legal
    contentions         are   adequately        presented     in   the     materials     before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1642

Citation Numbers: 547 F. App'x 298

Judges: King, Davis, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/4/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024