Kenneth Sanders v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-2093
    KENNETH SANDERS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.      Alexander Williams, Jr., District
    Judge. (8:11-cv-02153-AW)
    Submitted:   January 21, 2014             Decided: January 23, 2014
    Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kenneth Sanders, Appellant Pro      Se.    Brian Patrick Downey,
    Kathleen   Ann   Mullen,   PEPPER   HAMILTON,   LLP,  Harrisburg,
    Pennsylvania, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth Sanders seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order    in    his   civil     action   granting     Defendant’s       motion   for
    summary judgment in part and closing the case.                   We dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
    not timely filed.
    Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of
    the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,
    Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends
    the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
    appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).                      “[T]he timely
    filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
    requirement.”        Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    The district court’s order was entered on the docket
    on July 30, 2013.        The notice of appeal was filed on August               30,
    2013.     Because Sanders failed to file a timely notice of appeal
    or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we
    deny Sanders leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the
    appeal.       We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions     are    adequately     presented    in   the     materials
    before    this   court    and   argument     would   not   aid   the    decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-2093

Judges: Motz, Keenan, Thacker

Filed Date: 1/23/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024