Sayre v. Crim ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 99-7298
    KENNY DREW SAYRE, SR.,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LINDA FRANCIS CRIM,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    No. 99-7303
    KENNY DREW SAYRE, SR.,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SAM TAYLOR, Police Officer,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
    trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District
    Judge. (CA-99-155-1, CA-99-158-1)
    Submitted:   December 16, 1999           Decided:   December 22, 1999
    Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
    cuit Judge.
    Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kenny Drew Sayre, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Kenny Drew Sayre, Sr., appeals the district court's orders de-
    nying relief on his 
    42 U.S.C.A. § 1983
     (West Supp. 1999) complaints
    under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b) (West Supp. 1999).      We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible
    error.   We note that Sayre's damages claims are not cognizable
    under § 1983 because his conviction has not been reversed, ex-
    punged, declared invalid by a state court, or called into question
    by a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.    See Heck
    v. Humphrey, 
    512 U.S. 477
    , 486-87 (1994). Because Sayre may refile
    his claims should his conviction ever be overturned or called into
    question by the appropriate court or upon the exhaustion of his
    state remedies, we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice and
    affirm as modified.   See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2106
     (1994).    We deny Sayre's
    motions to have the complaints reinstated and his motion to sup-
    plement the record on appeal.   We dispense with oral argument be-
    cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-7298

Filed Date: 12/22/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014