Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. B. Diane Tamariz-Wallace ( 2017 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1405
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff/Counter Defendant – Appellee,
v.
B. DIANE TAMARIZ-WALLACE,
Defendant/Counter Claimant – Appellant,
and
DIANE TAMARIZ & ASSOCIATES, P.A.; MORAN INSURANCE SERVICES,
INC.; GEORGE T. MORAN, INC.; C. DAVID WALLACE,
Defendants,
and
NATIONWIDE BANK; CORRIGAN INSURANCE, INC.; WILLIAM P.
CORRIGAN, JR.; C.W. HAYES, III; CHARLENE E. HARDEE; SAMUEL
BRADSHAW, IV; JOHN PAUL PURSSORD,
Counter Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:09-cv-00667-JFM)
Submitted: January 27, 2017 Decided: February 16, 2017
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew S. Grimsley, CARYN GROEDEL & ASSOCIATES CO., LPA,
Cleveland, Ohio; John Singleton, SINGLETON LAW GROUP, PA,
Lutherville, Maryland, for Appellant. Quintin F. Lindsmith,
James P. Schuck, BRICKER & ECKLER, LLP, Columbus, Ohio; Patricia
McHugh Lambert, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
B. Diane Tamariz-Wallace appeals from the district court’s
order denying her motion to reopen the lawsuit between her and
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., which was administratively
closed after Tamariz-Wallace filed her petition for relief in
bankruptcy. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record
on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. See Providence Hall Assoc. Ltd.
P’ship v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 816 F.3d 273 (4th Cir. 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3