Jackie Adams v. Eric Wilson , 714 F. App'x 256 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 17-7229
    JACKIE VICTOR ADAMS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    ERIC D. WILSON,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00541-AWA-LRL)
    Submitted: February 26, 2018                                      Decided: March 7, 2018
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HARRIS, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jackie Victor Adams, Appellant Pro Se. William Buchanan Jackson, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM
    Jackie Victor Adams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
    accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss with prejudice Adams’ 28
    U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition in which Adams sought to challenge his armed career
    criminal designation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Adams
    has failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) is an
    inadequate or ineffective means of challenging the validity of his detention. See Rice v.
    Rivera, 
    617 F.3d 802
    , 807 (4th Cir. 2010); United States v. Poole, 
    531 F.3d 263
    , 267 n.7
    (4th Cir. 2008). As such, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of
    Adams’ petition. 
    Rice, 617 F.3d at 807
    . Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma
    pauperis, modify the district court’s judgment to reflect that the dismissal of Adams’
    petition is without prejudice, and affirm the district court’s judgment as modified. See S.
    Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC, 
    713 F.3d 175
    , 185 (4th Cir. 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-7229

Citation Numbers: 714 F. App'x 256

Judges: Gregory, Harris, Per Curiam, Shedd

Filed Date: 3/7/2018

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024