United States v. Felton , 321 F. App'x 283 ( 2009 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7863
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FRANKLIN LAJOY FELTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (4:03-cr-00474-CWH-14)
Submitted: March 30, 2009 Decided: April 10, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Franklin Lajoy Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Franklin Lajoy Felton appeals the district court’s
minute entry denying his motion for a sentence reduction under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We affirm.
We review an order granting or denying a § 3582(c)(2)
motion for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Goines,
357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating that § 3582(c)(2) is
“subject to the discretion of the district court”). Based on
relevant conduct and his criminal history category, Felton’s
initial Sentencing Guidelines range of imprisonment was 324 to
405 months. However, Felton’s Guidelines sentence was adjusted
to reflect the statutory minimum sentence of life imprisonment.
Because his sentence was not based on a sentencing range lowered
by Amendment 706, he was not eligible for a sentence reduction.
United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 233-36 (4th Cir. 2009).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s minute
entry. We deny as moot Felton’s motion for an extension of time
in which to note an appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2