United States v. Shawnetta Belton ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 19-6232
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    SHAWNETTA BELTON,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
    Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cr-00299-TLW-1; 3:16-cv-
    02963-TLW)
    Submitted: July 16, 2019                                          Decided: July 18, 2019
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Shawnetta Belton, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Shawnetta Belton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28
    U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the
    notice of appeal was not timely filed.
    When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal
    must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or
    order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under
    Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
    “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.”
    Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    The district court’s order was entered on the docket on October 3, 2018. The
    notice of appeal was filed on January 30, 2019. * Because Belton failed to file a timely
    notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss
    the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of
    appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for
    mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 
    487 U.S. 266
    (1988).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-6232

Filed Date: 7/18/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/18/2019