Jorge Reyes, Sr. v. Loretta Kelly , 491 F. App'x 392 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 12-7259
    JORGE LUIS REYES, SR.,
    Petitioner – Appellant,
    v.
    LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.  Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:09-cv-00023-HEH)
    Submitted:   November 30, 2012            Decided:   December 12, 2012
    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jorge Luis Reyes, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jorge Luis Reyes, Sr., seeks to appeal the district
    court’s    order     denying   relief      on    his     
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
        (2006)
    petition.     The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
    or judge issues a certificate of appealability.                            See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1)(A) (2006).          A certificate of appealability will not
    issue     absent     “a    substantial      showing           of    the    denial    of     a
    constitutional right.”          
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2006).                   When the
    district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies
    this    standard     by    demonstrating        that   reasonable          jurists    would
    find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional
    claims is debatable or wrong.              Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    ,
    484    (2000);     see    Miller-El   v.   Cockrell,          
    537 U.S. 322
    ,    336-38
    (2003).     When the district court denies relief on procedural
    grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
    procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a
    debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right.                             Slack,
    
    529 U.S. at 484-85
    .
    We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
    that Reyes has not made the requisite showing.                            Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                               We
    deny Reyes’ motion for appointment of counsel.                        We dispense with
    oral    argument     because    the    facts       and    legal       contentions         are
    2
    adequately   presented   in   the   materials   before   this   court   and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-7259

Citation Numbers: 491 F. App'x 392

Judges: Motz, Gregory, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/12/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024