-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7098 APRIL STUCKERS, Petitioner – Appellant, v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:11-hc-02193-F) Submitted: November 29, 2012 Decided: December 13, 2012 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. April Stuckers, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: April Stuckers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her
28 U.S.C. § 2254(2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack,
529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stuckers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny her motions for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 2 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3
Document Info
Docket Number: 12-7098
Citation Numbers: 491 F. App'x 400
Judges: Motz, Shedd, Keenan
Filed Date: 12/13/2012
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024