United States v. Sidney Evans , 491 F. App'x 404 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 12-7860
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    SIDNEY DERROD EVANS, a/k/a Dooley,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
    Judge. (2:02-cr-00225-AWA-2)
    Submitted:   December 13, 2012            Decided:   December 19, 2012
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam
    opinion.
    Sidney Derrod Evans, Appellant Pro Se.   Darryl James Mitchell,
    Assistant  United  States   Attorney,  Norfolk,  Virginia,  for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Sidney Derrod Evans appeals the district court’s order
    denying as moot his 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(2) (2006) motion for
    reduction of sentence.              On appeal, we confine our review to the
    issues raised in the appellant’s brief.                    See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
    Because Evans’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for
    the district court’s disposition, Evans has forfeited appellate
    review    of    the       court’s    order.         Accordingly,     we    affirm     the
    district court’s order.               United States v. Evans, No. 2:02-cr-
    00225-AWA-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2012).
    To   the    extent    Evans        seeks   to   appeal     the   district
    court’s July 18, 2003 judgment imposing a 331-month prison term
    and its March 26, 2010 order granting his § 3582(c)(2) motion
    and   reducing      his     sentence    to    295     months’    imprisonment, 1       his
    notice of appeal is untimely.                 The notice was filed in October
    2012, after the expiration of the ten-day period for appealing
    the July 18 judgment, Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i) (2008), and
    the fourteen-day period for appealing the March 26 order.                            Fed.
    R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i) (2009); see United States v. Alvarez,
    
    210 F.3d 309
    ,   310     (5th     Cir.       2000)   (holding   that       a   § 3582
    1
    The district court clerk treated Evans’ notice of appeal
    as seeking to appeal the district court’s October 3, 2012 order
    denying as moot his § 3582(c)(2) motion, the court’s July 18
    judgment, and the court’s March 26 order granting Evans’
    § 3582(c)(2) motion and reducing his sentence.
    2
    proceeding is criminal in nature and that the Rule 4(b)(1)(A)
    appeal period applies).        Accordingly, insofar as Evans seeks to
    appeal the July 18 judgment and the March 26 order, we dismiss
    his appeal as untimely. 2
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions    are   adequately   presented    in   the   materials
    before   this   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the   decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED IN PART;
    DISMISSED IN PART
    2
    We note that the appeal period in a criminal case is not a
    jurisdictional provision, but, rather, a claim-processing rule.
    Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 209-14 (2007); United States v.
    Urutyan, 
    564 F.3d 679
    , 685 (4th Cir. 2009).       Because Evans’
    appeal of the July 18 judgment and the March 26 order is
    inordinately late, and its consideration is not in the best
    interest of judicial economy, we exercise our inherent power to
    dismiss it.   United States v. Mitchell, 
    518 F.3d 740
    , 744, 750
    (10th Cir. 2008).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-7860

Citation Numbers: 491 F. App'x 404

Judges: Floyd, Motz, Per Curiam, Wynn

Filed Date: 12/19/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024