Stanley v. Gray ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-1134
    DAVID STANLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    LAZARON VENTURES, INCORPORATED,
    Plaintiff,
    versus
    GERALD LEE GRAY; PAUL DARRELL SMITH; J. ROBERT
    STUMP; J. JACK KENNEDY, JR.; CAROLINE STEVENS;
    COMMUNITY BASED CORRECTIONS; COUNTY OF WISE,
    VIRGINIA, a public entity; GREGORY KALLEN;
    BEHAVIORAL    INTERVENTIONS,     INCORPORATED;
    ANTHONY E. COLLINS,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief
    District Judge. (2:06-cv-00031-jpj)
    Submitted:   July 25, 2007                 Decided:   August 16, 2007
    Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David Stanley, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW
    FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Daniel Robert Bieger, COPELAND &
    BIEGER, PC, Abingdon, Virginia; George Walerian Chabalewski, James
    Van Ingold, James Christian Stuchell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
    GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Tarek F.M. Saad, HOLLAND
    & HART, LLP, Denver, Colorado; Michael Edward Anderson, MORRISON &
    FOERSTER, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Mark B. Wiletsky, HOLLAND & HART,
    Boulder, Colorado, for Appellees. Anthony E. Collins, Appellee Pro
    Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    David Kim Stanley appeals the district court’s order
    denying relief on his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2000) complaint, denying
    his motions to amend his complaint and to name defendant John Doe,
    and dismissing his state law claims without prejudice pursuant to
    
    28 U.S.C. § 1367
    (c) (2000).        We have reviewed the record and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
    by the district court.       Stanley v. Gray, No. 2:06-cv-00031-jpj
    (W.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2007).     We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials   before   the   court    and     argument   would   not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-1134

Filed Date: 8/16/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014