Margaret Reaves v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC , 676 F. App'x 217 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-2017
    MARGARET REAVES,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC; LITTON LOAN SERVICING; POPULAR
    FINANCIAL; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:16-cv-00186-FL)
    Submitted:   February 16, 2017            Decided:   February 21, 2017
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge,        DUNCAN,     Circuit   Judge,   and
    HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Margaret Reaves, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Michael Rowlson,
    BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Margaret Reaves seeks to appeal the district court’s order
    dismissing       her        civil    complaint.              This       court     may    exercise
    jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
    and    certain    interlocutory                and       collateral       orders,       28    U.S.C.
    § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
    Loan     Corp.,    
    337 U.S. 541
    ,       545-47       (1949).          Because         the
    deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by
    the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order
    Reaves    seeks        to     appeal       is    neither          a    final     order       nor    an
    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.                                   Goode v. Cent.
    Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 
    807 F.3d 619
    , 623 (4th Cir. 2015);
    Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 
    10 F.3d 1064
    , 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
    and remand the case to the district court with instructions to
    allow Reaves to file an amended complaint.                                     We dispense with
    oral   argument        because           the    facts       and       legal    contentions         are
    adequately    presented             in    the    materials            before    this    court      and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED AND REMANDED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-2017

Citation Numbers: 676 F. App'x 217

Judges: Duncan, Gregory, Hamilton, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 2/21/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024