Derek Jarvis v. Deborah Chasanow ( 2011 )

Certiorari dismissed, February 21, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1249
DEREK N. JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, Chief Judge, US District Court for the
District of Maryland; CHARLES B. DAY, Magistrate Judge, US
District Court for the District of Maryland; PETER J.
MESSITTE, Judge, US District Court for the District of
Maryland; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK’S OFFICE;
TRAXLER, Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit; WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, US Court of Appeals for
the Fourth Circuit; NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, US Court of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; AGEE, Circuit Judge, US
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:11-cv-00627-AW)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Jarvis v. Chasanow, No. 8:11-cv-00627-AW (D. Md. Mar.
15, 2011); see Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325, 335 (1983)
(noting that quasi-judicial immunity accorded to individuals who
play integral part in judicial process); Johnson v. Turner, 125
F.3d 324, 332 (6th Cir. 1997) (finding clerk’s office employees,
acting as a judge’s designee, are entitled to quasi-judicial
immunity). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2