United States v. Curtis Brockington ( 2016 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-4561
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CURTIS BROCKINGTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:07-cr-00438-REP-1)
Submitted: June 14, 2016 Decided: June 16, 2016
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Geremy C. Kamens, Acting Federal Public Defender, Patrick L.
Bryant, Appellate Attorney, Robert J. Wagner, Assistant Federal
Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J.
Boente, United States Attorney, David T. Maguire, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Brockington appeals the district court’s judgment
revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to 30 months’
imprisonment. Brockington argues that his sentence was plainly
unreasonable because the district court did not properly weigh
the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) factors and failed to explain
adequately the sentence it imposed. We have reviewed the record
and conclude that the district court did not err in its
determination or explanation of Brockington’s sentence. See
United States v. Webb, 738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2