Antwan Sen El v. Rachel Fleming ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                 UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-1992
    ANTWAN EUGENE FORD SEN EL,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    RACHEL   ANN    FESTA   FLEMING,   Judge;   HERMAN   MELVIN   HOWELL,
    Judge,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    CLOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT; PHILLIP HAWKINS, #311;               C.   B.
    FORD, #304; SGT. CALDWELL, #319; SELESTINO, #305,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.    Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
    District Judge. (0:13-cv-00446-CMC-PJG)
    Submitted:     December 17, 2013              Decided:   January 13, 2014
    Before KING, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Antwan Eugene Ford Sen El, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Antwan Eugene Ford Sen El seeks to appeal the district
    court’s    order     accepting      the     recommendation       of   the    magistrate
    judge and dismissing Defendants Judge Fleming and Judge Howell
    without prejudice from this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
    (2006).     This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
    orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
    collateral    orders,       28    U.S.C.    § 1292    (2012);     Fed.      R.    Civ.   P.
    54(b); Cohen        v.    Beneficial      Indus.   Loan    Corp.,     
    337 U.S. 541
    ,
    545-46 (1949).           The order Sen El seeks to appeal is neither a
    final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                             We
    dispense     with        oral    argument     because      the    facts      and    legal
    contentions    are       adequately       presented   in    the   materials         before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1992

Filed Date: 1/13/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021