Green v. Robinson ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-7067
    ELTON TIMOTHY GREEN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    A.D. ROBINSON, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:06-cv-01154-CMH)
    Submitted:   December 20, 2007         Decided:     December 27, 2007
    Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Elton Timothy Green, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey,
    III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Elton Timothy Green seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.                    The
    order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
    certificate of appealability.           See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).
    A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                       28 U.S.C.
    §   2253(c)(2)    (2000).      A   prisoner     satisfies     this   standard     by
    demonstrating     that    reasonable       jurists    would     find    that     any
    assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the   district    court   is   likewise     debatable.        See    Miller-El    v.
    Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).
    We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Green
    has not made the requisite showing.             Accordingly, we deny Green’s
    motion   for     appointment       of   counsel,     deny   a   certificate       of
    appealability, and dismiss the appeal.                 We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-7067

Filed Date: 12/27/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021