United States v. Tariq Belt ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-6867
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    TARIQ   BELT, a/k/a Ty,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.     William D. Quarles, Jr., District
    Judge. (1:03-cr-00376-WDQ-1)
    Submitted:   August 21, 2014                 Decided:   August 26, 2014
    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Tariq Liyuen Adevemi Belt, Appellant Pro Se.  Jane Meadowcroft
    Erisman, Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States
    Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Tariq Belt appeals the district court’s orders denying
    his     motion       for     a     furlough        and   denying     his      motion    for
    reconsideration.            Belt sought a temporary release from prison
    from    June     5   to    June     9,   2014,      to   enable    him   to    attend   his
    daughter’s graduation and a family celebration of the event.
    Because this time period has passed, this appeal is moot.                               See
    In re Stadium Mgt. Corp., 
    895 F.2d 845
    , 847 (1st Cir. 1990)
    (“Absent a stay, the court must dismiss a pending appeal as moot
    because the court has no remedy that it can fashion even if it
    would have determined the issues differently.”).                              Accordingly,
    we    deny   leave     to    proceed     in    forma     pauperis    and      dismiss   the
    appeal.        We deny Belt’s pending motions for entry of default,
    for release on bail, and “for Clarification and Obtaining of the
    Entire    Record.”          We     dispense    with      oral   argument      because   the
    facts    and     legal      contentions       are    adequately     presented      in   the
    materials      before       this    court     and    argument      would   not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-6867

Filed Date: 8/26/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021