Karim Akbar v. P.E.R.T. Officers ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-7525
    KARIM ABDUL AKBAR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    P.E.R.T. OFFICERS,
    Defendant – Appellee,
    and
    JOYCE   KORNEGAY,   Commander;     MR.         MOBELY,   Assistant
    Superintendent   of  Programs;     JOHNNY     HAWKINS,   Assistant
    Superintendent of Custody,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:12-ct-03233-FL)
    Submitted:   January 15, 2015               Decided:   January 21, 2015
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Karim Abdul Akbar, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH
    CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Karim Abdul Akbar seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order directing the Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
    action    to    respond      to   his   amended          motion   for    discovery      and
    holding in abeyance the motions for discovery.                          This court may
    exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
    (2012),       and   certain   interlocutory          and    collateral        orders,   28
    U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
    Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).                         The order Akbar
    seeks    to    appeal   is    neither    a       final    order   nor    an   appealable
    interlocutory or collateral order.                   Accordingly, we dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                  We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-7525

Filed Date: 1/21/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/21/2015