Jeffrey Edwards v. Carey Winders , 589 F. App'x 211 ( 2015 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7363
JEFFREY EDWARDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MAJOR GREENFIELD; LT. SCOTT; OFFICER CARCIRIERI; MIKE COX,
Lieutenant; CHRIS WORTH, Lieutenant; CHUCK ARNOLD, Sargent;
SHERIFF LARRY M. PIERCE; DR. CLEMENT L. MCCASKILL,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CAREY WINDERS, Sheriff,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03184-FL)
Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John
Derrenbacher, PATTERSON DILTHEY, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina;
Joseph Michael McGuinness, Elizabethtown, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Edwards seeks to appeal the district court’s
order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motions
to dismiss. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-
46 (1949). A final order is one that disposes of all issues in
dispute as to all parties. It “ends the litigation on the
merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the
judgment.” Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945).
The order Edwards seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3