In Re: Maximiliano Penaloza-Rebollar v. ( 2015 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1664
In re: MAXIMILIANO PENALOZA-REBOLLAR, a/k/a Tomas Pelaez
Isidoro, a/k/a Daniel Aguerre-Rodriguez, a/k/a Ramiro
Pesina,
Petitioner.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:09-cr-00415-NCT-1; 1:12-cv-00948-NCT-JLW)
Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 10, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maximiliano Penaloza-Rebollar, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Maximiliano Penaloza-Rebollar petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. Our review of
the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has
entered an order denying relief on Penaloza-Rebollar’s § 2255
motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently
acted in this case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2