Timothy Coles v. Harold Clarke ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-7481
    TIMOTHY LEE COLES,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    HAROLD   CLARKE,   Director  of   Virginia   Department  of
    Corrections, sued individually and in official capacity;
    GARY BASS, Chief of operations of Central Classification
    Services, sued individually and in official capacity; WENDY
    HOBBS, Eastern Regional Director, sued individually and in
    official capacity; MARIE VARGO, Warden of Sussex II State
    Prison, sued individually and in official capacity; ROY
    CLARY, Unit Manager of 3 Building of (SXIISP), sued
    individually and in official capacity; ANTON DANIELS,
    Correctional   Institutional  Rehabilitation  Counselor  of
    Sussex II State Prison, sued individually and in official
    capacity,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    GAIL JONES, Chair Person, Central Classification Services
    (CCS), sued individually and in official capacity,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.   Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:12-cv-00001-REP)
    Submitted:   February 27, 2015             Decided:   March 20, 2015
    Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Timothy Lee Coles, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, Lara
    Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Timothy      Lee   Coles    appeals     the    district      court’s   order
    dismissing his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2012) complaint for failure to
    state   a     claim.    We    have    reviewed     the   record    and   find   no
    reversible error.       Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
    by the district court.          Coles v. Clarke, No. 3:12-cv-00001-REP
    (E.D.   Va.    Sept. 12,     2014).     We   dispense     with    oral   argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-7481

Filed Date: 3/20/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/20/2015