Edward Reese v. Jeanine Slater ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-6098
    EDWARD REESE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JEANINE SLATER; DR. MATTIOLI; MS. LARKEN,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    KIERAN J. SHANAHAN; REUBEN YOUNG; W. DAVID GUICE; GEORGE T.
    SOLOMON; CARL JOYNER; CYNTHIA THORNTON; FRANK PERRY,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:13-ct-03126-BO)
    Submitted:   March 17, 2015                 Decided:   March 20, 2015
    Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Edward Reese, Appellant Pro Se.      Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH
    CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Nathan
    Douglas Childs, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE &
    HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Edward Reese appeals the district court’s order dismissing
    without    prejudice       his     
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
         (2012)       civil    rights
    action    for     failure     to    exhaust      his   available      administrative
    remedies.       On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
    in the Appellant’s brief.                 See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).                  Because
    Reese’s    informal       brief    does   not    challenge    the     basis       for   the
    district       court’s     disposition,      Reese     has   forfeited        appellate
    review    of     the     court’s    order.        Accordingly,       we    affirm       the
    district    court’s       judgment.        We    dispense     with    oral    argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-6098

Filed Date: 3/20/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/20/2015