Debra Feaster v. Federal Express Corporation ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-2025
    DEBRA FEASTER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (2:13-cv-02517-DCN)
    Submitted:   March 24, 2015                 Decided:   March 31, 2015
    Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Debra Feaster, Appellant Pro Se.     Lucille Lattimore Nelson,
    OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charleston, South
    Carolina; Patrick Daniel Riederer, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,
    Memphis, Tennessee, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Debra Feaster appeals the district court’s order accepting
    the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary
    judgment     to   Federal      Express     Corporation      on        her   claims      of    a
    hostile work environment and discrimination, in violation of 
    42 U.S.C. § 1981
     (2012), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
    of 1967, as amended, 
    29 U.S.C. §§ 621
     to 634 (2012), and Title
    VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
    §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012).               We have reviewed the record and
    find   no    reversible        error.      Accordingly,          we    affirm     for    the
    reasons stated by the district court.                  Feaster v. Fed. Express
    Corp.,      No.   2:13-cv-02517-DCN         (D.S.C.    Aug.           28,     2014).         We
    dispense      with      oral    argument    because        the        facts    and     legal
    contentions       are   adequately      presented     in    the       materials        before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-2025

Filed Date: 3/31/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/31/2015