Terri Williams v. Kathleen Sebelius ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 14-2231
    TERRI L. WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Department of Health and
    Human Services; ANN TAUBENHEIM, Supervisory Public Health
    Advisor, National Institutes of Health, National Heart,
    Lung and Blood Institutes, Department of Health and Human
    Services;   TIMOTHY WHEELES,   Acting   Executive  Officer,
    National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and
    Human     Services;   SALLY    MCDONOUGH,    Director    of
    Communications, National Institutes of Health, National
    Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes, Department of Health and
    Human Services,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
    (8:13-cv-02527-RWT)
    Submitted:   April 15, 2015                 Decided:   April 28, 2015
    Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Terri L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.      Alex Gordon, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Terri Williams appeals the district court’s order denying
    relief on her complaint under 
    42 U.S.C. § 1981
     (2012), Title VII
    of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
    (2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 
    29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634
     (2012).          We have reviewed the record and find
    no reversible error.          Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
    stated     by   the     district     court.       Williams      v.     Burwell,
    8:13-cv-02527-RWT, 
    2014 WL 5797777
     (D. Md. Nov. 5, 2014).                     We
    dispense    with      oral   argument   because      the    facts    and   legal
    contentions     are   adequately    presented   in    the   materials      before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-2231

Filed Date: 4/28/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/28/2015