United States v. Jorge Petter ( 2012 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6033
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JORGE PETTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:06-cr-00162-RAJ-JEB-1)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jorge Petter, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jorge Petter appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for correction of judgment under Fed. R.
Crim. P. 36. Because we conclude that there were no clerical
errors, we affirm. See United States v. Buendia-Rangel, 553
F.3d 378, 379 (5th Cir. 2008) (affirming denial of Rule 36
motion where judgment lacked indicia of mistake or oversight,
but rather reflected deliberate use of terminology employed).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2