Emma Howard v. Vance County Sheriff Dept. ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-2100
    EMMA VICTORIA JOHNSON HOWARD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    VANCE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.; W. B. LILLEY, Sergeant of the
    Vance County Sheriff's Dept., Individually and in his
    officially capacity; VANCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT; RAYMOND
    EARL DICKERSON, d/b/a T.L. Perkinson Wrecker Service,
    Defendants – Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.   Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:15-cv-00110-FL)
    Submitted:   November 19, 2015            Decided:   December 7, 2015
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Emma Victoria Howard, Appellant Pro Se.          Sonny Sade Haynes,
    WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC,         Winston-Salem, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Emma Victoria Johnson Howard seeks to appeal the district
    court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to
    dismiss Howard’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action in part and to
    allow   certain      claims   to   proceed.           This    court    may      exercise
    jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
    and   certain     interlocutory        and       collateral    orders,     28    U.S.C.
    § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
    Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).                    The order Howard seeks
    to    appeal    is    neither      a    final       order     nor     an   appealable
    interlocutory or collateral order.                  Accordingly, we dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                 We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-2100

Filed Date: 12/7/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021