Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of MD ( 2017 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1981
RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:15-cv-03196-RWT)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se. Nigel F. Telman,
Amanda C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex
Chad Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the magistrate judge’s
order awarding costs and attorney’s fees in favor of McDonald’s
Restaurants of Maryland, Inc. (McDonald’s), and the district
court’s order granting McDonald’s motion to dismiss
Suteerachanon’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought
pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp.
2016). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the
appealed-from orders. See Suteerachanon v. McDonald’s
Restaurants of Md., Inc., No. 8:15-cv-03196-RWT (D. Md. July 15,
2016 & July 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2