United States v. Darryl Riley ( 2017 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7408
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYL GLEN RILEY, a/k/a Kendu,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Glen Riley, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Hart Mansfield,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have
reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in denying Riley’s motion. See United
States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Riley, No. 3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2