George Cleveland, III v. Willie Eagleton ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-6527
    GEORGE CLEVELAND, III,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN WILLIE EAGLETON, individually and in his official
    capacity; ASSOCIATE WARDEN ROLAND MCFADDEN, individually and
    in his official capacity; OFFICER M. THOMAS; UNKNOWN NURSE;
    UNKNOWN MEDICAL DOCTOR; ALL EMPLOYED AT EVANS CORRECTIONAL,
    or a contract employee,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    EVANS   CORRECTIONAL    INSTITUTION;   IGC         ANGIE     GRAVES,
    individually and in her official capacity,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (4:14-cv-02444-RBH)
    Submitted:   November 30, 2016              Decided:   December 8, 2016
    Before DIAZ and    THACKER,    Circuit   Judges,   and     DAVIS,   Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    George Cleveland, III, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III,
    AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South
    Carolina for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court’s order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief   on   his    42    U.S.C.   § 1983      (2012)   complaint.       We    have
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.                  Accordingly,
    we   affirm    for     the   reasons      stated   by    the   district    court.
    Cleveland     v.   Eagleton,     No.     4:14-cv-02444-RBH     (D.S.C.    Mar.    7,
    2016).   We grant Cleveland’s motion to accept as timely filed
    his informal brief, and we dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials     before      this   court    and   argument   would   not    aid    the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-6527

Filed Date: 12/8/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021