Regina Fletcher v. Michael Astrue ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 12-2544
    REGINA JUANITA FLETCHER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Thomas M. DiGirolamo, Magistrate Judge.
    (1:10-cv-03358-TMD)
    Submitted:   March 26, 2013                 Decided:   March 28, 2013
    Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Regina Juanita Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se.              Alex Gordon,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,           Maryland, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Regina Juanita Fletcher seeks to appeal the magistrate
    judge’s     final    order *      upholding       the     Commissioner         of     Social
    Security’s denial of benefits.                  In civil cases like Fletcher’s,
    parties    are   accorded        sixty   days     after    entry    of    the       district
    court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal.                        Fed. R. App.
    P. 4(a)(1)(B).           The order that Fletcher seeks to appeal was
    entered on September 24, 2012.              Fletcher thus had sixty days, or
    until Friday, November 23, 2012, to file a notice of appeal.
    Nevertheless, Fletcher did not file a notice of appeal until
    December 7, 2012 — two weeks too late.
    Because “the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a
    civil     case      is    a      jurisdictional          requirement,”          we     lack
    jurisdiction to consider Fletcher’s claims.                     Bowles v. Russell,
    
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).                Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal
    for lack of jurisdiction.                We deny leave to proceed in forma
    pauperis.     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions      are     adequately       presented       in    the    materials
    before    this   court     and    argument       would    not   aid     the    decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    Fletcher consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the
    magistrate judge, as permitted by 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c) (2006).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-2544

Filed Date: 3/28/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021