United States v. Mark Howell ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7670
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK ALLEN HOWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (4:08-cr-00041-BO-1; 4:11-cv-00185-BO)
Submitted: March 25, 2013 Decided: April 4, 2013
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul K. Sun, Jr., ELLIS & WINTERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney,
Jennifer P. May-Parker, Yvonne V. Watford-McKinney, Assistant
United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Allen Howell appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion as
untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
United States v. Howell, No. 4:08-cr-00041-BO-1 (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 4, 2012); cf. Lo v. Endicott, 506 F.3d 572, 575 (7th Cir.
2007); E.J.R.E. v. United States, 453 F.3d 1094, 1098 (8th Cir.
2006); Shannon v. Newland, 410 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th Cir. 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2