Reyes-Vara v. Holder , 353 F. App'x 813 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-1574
    EDGAR JAVIER REYES-VARA,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   November 19, 2009              Decided:   December 2, 2009
    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Edgar Javier Reyes-Vara, Petitioner Pro Se.       Daniel Eric
    Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Tyrone Sojourner, Matthew
    Allan   Spurlock,  UNITED    STATES DEPARTMENT   OF   JUSTICE,
    Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Edgar   Javier       Reyes-Vara,          a    native    and     citizen      of
    Mexico,    petitions      for    review     of    an       order    of    the    Board    of
    Immigration    Appeals     (“Board”)        dismissing        his    appeal      from    the
    Immigration Judge’s decision, which found him removable as an
    alien convicted of a crime of violence that qualified as an
    aggravated felony and ordered him removed to Mexico.
    Before this court, Reyes-Vara contends the Board erred
    in finding that he was convicted of an aggravated felony.                              Based
    on our review of the record, we agree that the 2007 conviction
    under    Virginia   law    for   assault        and    battery      against      a    family
    member, third offense, amounted to a “crime of violence” and was
    therefore an aggravated felony.                  See 
    8 U.S.C. § 1101
    (a)(43)(F)
    (2006); 
    18 U.S.C. § 16
    (a) (2006).                         Thus, the Board properly
    upheld the charge of removability on this ground.                           See 
    8 U.S.C. § 1227
    (a)(2)(A)(iii) (2006); In re: Reyes-Vara (B.I.A. Apr. 29,
    2009).
    Accordingly,        we   deny       the    petition      for     review.      We
    dispense    with    oral    argument        because         the     facts       and   legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-1574

Citation Numbers: 353 F. App'x 813

Judges: Michael, Motz, Duncan

Filed Date: 12/2/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024