Tamrat v. Holder , 358 F. App'x 426 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-1377
    GEDION TAMRAT,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   November 18, 2009           Decided:   December 28, 2009
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David Allen Garfield, Catherine A. Reynolds, LAW OFFICES OF
    DAVID GARFIELD, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West,
    Assistant Attorney General, Susan K. Houser, Senior Litigation
    Counsel, W. Daniel Shieh, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION,
    Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Gedion    Tamrat,         a    native       and   citizen       of    Ethiopia,
    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals     affirming       the       Immigration         Judge’s      denial       of     his
    applications for relief from removal.
    Tamrat challenges the determination that he failed to
    establish    eligibility      for         asylum.       To    obtain    reversal         of    a
    determination      denying    eligibility           for    relief,     an    alien       “must
    show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no
    reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of
    persecution.”        INS    v.    Elias-Zacarias,             
    502 U.S. 478
    ,      483-84
    (1992).     We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude
    that Tamrat fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary
    result.
    Accordingly,         we    deny       the   petition    for     review.           We
    dispense    with     oral    argument         because         the   facts        and     legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-1377

Citation Numbers: 358 F. App'x 426

Judges: Niemeyer, Motz, Agee

Filed Date: 12/28/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024