Wayne Vinson v. United States Marshals Service ( 2011 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7316
WAYNE VINSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; DAVID CRANEFORD; DEONTYE
JOYNER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (0:10-cv-00079-RMG)
Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 20, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Vinson, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Emery Clark, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Vinson appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
dismissing Vinson’s claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort
Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2006), and
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Vinson v. U.S. Marshals
Service, No. 0:10-cv-00079-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2