Ophelia De'Lonta v. Sarah Pruitt ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7307
OPHELIA AZRIEL DE’LONTA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SARAH PRUITT, Correctional Officer,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, VADOC; G. K. WASHINGTON, Regional
Admin; LARRY EDMONDS, Warden, BKCC; C. DAVIS, Major, Chief
of Security; DAVIS, Institutional Investigator; AGENT
WATSON, Internal Affairs Unit; LISA LANG, Staff
Psychologist; ATTORNEY GENERAL KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI; DON
LEMOND, Director,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00483-JCT-RSB)
Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta, Appellant Pro Se. Antonio Pierre
Jackson, LAW OFFICE OF A. PIERRE JACKSON, P.C., Hampden-Sydney,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta appeals the jury verdict in
favor of Defendant Sarah Pruitt and the district court’s prior
order granting the other Defendants’ motion for summary judgment
in De’Lonta’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. * De’Lonta v.
Pruitt, No. 7:11-cv-00483-JCT-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2012; July
18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
We note that the only issue De’Lonta raises with respect
to the jury trial is Pruitt’s failure to timely respond to
De’Lonta’s revised motion to compel production of documents. We
find no reversible error in this regard.
3