United States v. Hendricks ( 2009 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7915
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHALMERS LAVETTE HENDRICKS, a/k/a Champ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (3:94-cr-00030-MR-GCM-4)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chalmers Lavette Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth
Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chalmers Lavette Hendricks appeals a district court
order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded
Hendricks was not entitled to a reduction because even with the
benefit of Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines, his
Guidelines range of imprisonment remained the same. We have
reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2