Bardes v. Magera ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-2191
    DAVID A. BARDES, individually as a taxpayer; and as next
    friend of his two minor children, DAB and APB,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN M. MAGERA, individually and in his official capacity as
    State's Attorney for South Carolina Department of Social
    Services; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLESTON COUNTY SOUTH
    CAROLINA; COUNTY COUNCIL OF CHARLESTON SOUTH CAROLINA; MCROY
    CANTERBURY, JR., individually and in his official capacity
    as Administrator for Charleston County; KATHLEEN M. HAYES,
    individually and in her official capacity as the South
    Carolina Department of Social Services State Director; JAMES
    A. CANNON, JR., individually and in his official capacity as
    Sheriff of Charleston County South Carolina; CORRECT CARE
    SOLUTIONS, LLC; Hon. R. WRIGHT TURBEVILLE, individually and
    in his official capacity as a Judge of the State of South
    Carolina; Hon. JOCELYN B. CATE, individually and in her
    official capacity as a Judge of the State of South Carolina;
    Hon. PAUL W. GARFINKEL, individually and in his official
    capacity as a Judge of the State of South Carolina; JULIE J.
    ARMSTRONG, individually and in her official capacity as
    Clerk of the Courts for the Charleston Judicial Center;
    WISHART NORRIS HENNINGER AND PITTMAN PA; WADE HARRISON,
    Esq., individually and in his official capacity as officer
    within any court of law,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    ODESSA WILLIAMS, individually and in her official capacity
    as Charleston County Department of Social Services Director,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.    Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
    District Judge. (2:08-cv-00487-PMD-RSC)
    Submitted:   March 16, 2010              Decided:   March 19, 2010
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David A. Bardes, Appellant Pro Se.         Stephanie Pendarvis
    McDonald, SENN, MCDONALD & LEINBACK, LLC, Charleston, South
    Carolina, Amanda R. Maybank, MAYBANK LAW FIRM, LLC, Charleston,
    South Carolina, Pamela Suzanne Duffy, Molly Anne Whitlatch,
    WISHART, NORRIS, HENNINGER & PITTMAN, PA, Burlington, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    David A. Bardes seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
    and   dismissing       all    but    one    of    Bardes’s    claims   and    attendant
    defendants.       This       court    may    exercise       jurisdiction     only    over
    final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory
    and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
    54(b); Cohen      v.    Beneficial         Indus.    Loan    Corp.,    
    337 U.S. 541
    ,
    545-47 (1949).         The order Bardes seeks to appeal is neither a
    final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.                          We
    dispense   with        oral    argument          because     the   facts     and    legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1990

Filed Date: 3/19/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021