United States v. Timothy Eddington , 548 F. App'x 914 ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7711
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TIMOTHY WAYNE EDDINGTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-7762
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TIMOTHY WAYNE EDDINGTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (0:07-cr-01149-CMC-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2013 Decided: December 20, 2013
Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Wayne Eddington, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Claude
Jendron, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Wayne Eddington was convicted in a 2008 jury
trial of conspiracy to commit bank robbery and related charges.
This court affirmed the convictions on appeal. United States v.
Eddington, 416 F. App’x 258 (4th Cir. 2011) (Nos. 08-4798/4799).
His 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion to vacate has
also been rejected. See United States v. Eddington, 520 F. App’x
214 (4th Cir. 2013) (No. 12-7989). In these consolidated
appeals, Eddington challenges district court orders denying his
motion for discovery and motion to remove the district court’s
separation order. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Eddington, No. 0:07-cr-
01149-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2013; Oct. 4, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗
The district court’s criminal judgment ordered that
Eddington be housed in a different institution from his son and
other codefendants.
3