In Re: Randolph Austin v. ( 2013 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2042
In re: RANDOLPH HARRIS AUSTIN, a/k/a Randolph Harris, a/k/a
Matarbus Raynard Fewell,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:05-cr-00213-RJC-DCK-1;
3:11-cv-00040-RJC)
Submitted: December 17, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randolph Harris Austin, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Randolph Harris Austin petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in
ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act. We find
the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district
court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2