Mooring v. East Carolina Univ ( 2002 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1911
LINWOOD E. MOORING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY; ROBBIE HUDSON,
official capacity; EARNIE MARSHABURN, official
capacity; JOE NORRIS, official capacity; WOODY
BOLTON, official capacity; GLORIA SCHWARTZ,
official capacity; PAULA HUTCHINSON, official
capacity; ROGER NOBLES, official capacity;
ARTHUR G. HOWELL, JR., official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-02-62-4-H(3))
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linwood E. Mooring, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oregon Lawton, III,
Associate Attorney General, Celia Grasty Lata, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Linwood E. Mooring appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985,
1986, 1988 (2000), his criminal conspiracy claims under 18 U.S.C.
§§ 241, 242 (2000), and his Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (RICO) claims under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1962(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Mooring v. East Carolina Univ., No. CA-02-62-4H(3) (E.D.N.C. Aug.
6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2