Pierce v. King ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-6450
    RICKY A. PIERCE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT KING; SERGEANT BOYD;
    SERGEANT CHEEKS; SUPERINTENDENT WILLIAMS;
    LIEUTENANT BURROUGHS; OFFICER CANNIE; OFFICER
    SMITH, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; CASE-
    WORKER JEFFERIES,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Intervenor.
    No. 96-7061
    RICKY A. PIERCE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT KING; SERGEANT BOYD;
    SERGEANT CHEEKS; SUPERINTENDENT WILLIAMS;
    LIEUTENANT BURROUGHS; OFFICER CANNIE; OFFICER
    SMITH, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; CASE-
    WORKER JEFFERIES,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-94-523-5-BO)
    Argued:   October 3, 1997             Decided:   December 11, 1997
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and MAGILL, Senior
    Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth
    Circuit, sitting by designation.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    ARGUED: Neal Lawrence Walters, Appellate Litigation Clinic, UNI-
    VERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW, Charlottesville, Virginia; Seth
    Michael Galanter, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
    D.C., for Appellant. William Dennis Worley, Assistant Attorney
    General, Ronald Moore Marquette, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUS-
    TICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Michael F.
    Easley, Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Ricky A. Pierce, a disabled inmate at the Tillery Correctional
    Center in North Carolina, appeals from a decision of the United
    States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
    granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, officials
    employed by the North Carolina Department of Corrections.   Pierce
    alleges a violation of his rights under Title II of the Americans
    with Disabilities Act, 
    42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12165
    .   For the reasons
    stated in Amos v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correc-
    tional Services, No. 96-7091, 
    1997 WL 581652
     (Sept. 22, 1997), we
    affirm.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-6450

Filed Date: 12/11/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014