Thomas Nash Burke v. M.A. Stanford O.J. Garland L.W. Huffman A.W. Woolfrey G.T. Landes W.J. White W.E. Jack , 808 F.2d 834 ( 1986 )
Menu:
-
808 F.2d 834
Unpublished DispositionNOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thomas Nash BURKE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M.A. STANFORD; O.J. Garland; L.W. Huffman; A.W. Woolfrey;
G.T. Landes; W.J. White; W.E. Jack, Defendants-Appellees.No. 86-7119.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 31, 1986.
Decided Dec. 29, 1986.Before ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Thomas Nash Burke, appellant pro se.
Mark R. Davis, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM:
1A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Burke v. Stanford, C/A No. 85-26-H (W.D.Va., March 31, 1986).
2AFFIRMED.
Document Info
Docket Number: 86-7119
Citation Numbers: 808 F.2d 834, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 35111
Filed Date: 12/29/1986
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 12/22/2014