United States v. Donikki Hardy ( 2014 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7420
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DONIKKI HARDY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1)
Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donikki Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donikki Hardy appeals from the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion for reduction of
sentence on the basis of the Fair Sentencing Act. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s ruling and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the
reason stated by the district court. United States v. Hardy,
No. 7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2013). In addition, we
note that Hardy’s claim is foreclosed by our recent decision in
United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280 (4th Cir. 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2