Jefferey Hurley v. Harold Clarke ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-7370
    JEFFEREY A. HURLEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of
    Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.    Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
    District Judge. (2:12-cv-00408-RBS-TEM)
    Submitted:   December 19, 2013            Decided:   December 24, 2013
    Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jefferey A. Hurley, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jefferey       A.   Hurley    seeks       to    appeal       the     district
    court’s    order   accepting       the     recommendation           of    the    magistrate
    judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)
    petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
    or   judge    issues     a    certificate       of    appealability.             28    U.S.C.
    § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006).            A certificate of appealability will not
    issue     absent   “a        substantial     showing         of    the     denial       of    a
    constitutional right.”            28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006).                  When the
    district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner
    must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is
    debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the
    denial of a constitutional right.                    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484-85 (2000).
    We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
    that Hurley has not made the requisite showing.                           Accordingly, we
    deny Hurley’s motion to compel and motion for a certificate of
    appealability,     deny       leave   to    proceed      in       forma    pauperis,         and
    dismiss the appeal.            We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts   and    legal     contentions       are   adequately          presented         in    the
    materials     before     this     court    and       argument      would    not       aid    the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-7370

Filed Date: 12/24/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021