Brent v. Kupec ( 2005 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6909
CHARLES BRENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT KUPEC, Warden, Individually and in
Official Capacity; PAUL HANDY, Administrative
Judge; CALVIN WILSON, Hearing Officer;
COUNSELOR COOPER, Classification Counselor,
Individually and in Official Capacity; R.
DRYDEN, Security Chief, Individually and in
Official Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-04-1-3746)
Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: December 16, 2005
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Brent, Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Brent appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brent v. Kupec,
No. CA-04-1-3746 (D. Md. May 5, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -