Lawrence Dukes v. W.K. Jones Alvin Newman , 76 F.3d 372 ( 1996 )


Menu:
  • 76 F.3d 372

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
    Lawrence DUKES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    W.K. JONES; Alvin Newman, Defendants-Appellees.

    No. 95-7334.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

    Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
    Decided Feb. 1, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-232-5-F)

    Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Lawrence Dukes, Appellant Pro Se.

    E.D.N.C.

    AFFIRMED.

    PER CURIAM:

    1

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dukes v. Jones, No. CA-95-232-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-7334

Citation Numbers: 76 F.3d 372, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6790

Filed Date: 2/1/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021