Jones v. INS ( 1999 )


Menu:
  • \                           UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 98-1271
    ANDRE NEWTON JONES,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    U. S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals. (A38-577-485)
    Submitted:   November 16, 1999         Decided:     December 10, 1999
    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jeffrey Brian O’Toole, O’TOOLE, ROTHWELL, NASSAU & STEINBACH,
    Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. John Joseph Andre, UNITED STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, David Michael McConnell, OFFICE OF
    IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Andre Newton Jones petitions for review of a final order of
    deportation issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals.               Jones is
    a resident alien facing deportation for having been convicted of an
    aggravated    felony        under    Section      241(a)(2)(A)(iii)    of   the
    Immigration   and      Nationality         Act,   codified   at   
    8 U.S.C.A. § 1227
    (a)(2)(A)(iii)(West 1999). Because Jones is an alien who was
    convicted of a deportable criminal offense, the Illegal Immigration
    Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-
    208, § 309(c)(4)(G), 
    110 Stat. 3009
    , divests this court of subject
    matter jurisdiction over his case.            See Hall v. INS, 
    167 F.3d 852
    ,
    854 (4th Cir. 1999); see also Morel v. INS, 
    144 F.3d 248
    , 251-52
    (3d Cir. 1998).
    Accordingly,      we    grant   the    Immigration   and   Naturalization
    Service’s motion to dismiss the petition for judicial review.               We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-1271

Filed Date: 12/10/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014