Newman v. Washington ( 2007 )

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Newman appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reopen the appeal period pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Newman v. Washington, No. 7:05-cv-00311-JLK (W.D.Va. Oct. 31 & Nov. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.